"nemesis" <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:

> surely he's a great fan of your anaglyphs! :)  Really, I don't know anyone  else
> who's been povving in stereo... :)

Thank you. The choose of stereo in general and anaglyph in particular was
because of so little competition.

....
> * anaglyph loses color info
Yes, that's why some of me pictures are gray scale instead.

> * anaglyph requires glasses not readily available (and my cheap hand-made
> cellophane one doesn't really offer such a marvelous experience)
> * very few people are able to visualize cross-view or parallel-view stereograms
> without getting pain or angry at not getting it
I have this problem, the %1 of the time I get it, is to much work for the
result.

> in short:  very few people are able to watch 3D content either because they lack
> glasses or patience or skill or whatever.
>
> I don't think 3D TVs with glasses will ever become popular.
....
I would like to get this one day. The 3d shutter glasses I think give the best
3d results.

Stephen S

Post a reply to this message