POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : CSG merge/union test : Re: CSG merge/union test Server Time
2 Nov 2024 16:12:58 EDT (-0400)
  Re: CSG merge/union test  
From: StephenS
Date: 14 Jun 2010 06:45:01
Message: <web.4c16070b2c8ab7227ff7427f0@news.povray.org>
clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> I'd suggest
>
>    difference {
>      merge {
>        /* individual primitive objects comprising the basic shape */
>      }
>      union {
>        /* individual primitive objects to be cut away */
>      }
>    }
>
> or simply
>
>    difference {
>      merge {
>        /* individual primitive objects comprising the basic shape */
>      }
>      /* individual primitive objects to be cut away */
>    }

Thanks,
difference {
 merge{}
 union{}
}
is giveing me some good results. Use of translate, .000001, is helping to avoid
co-incident surface, the other major problem in this progect. Will post a
picture after some more progress.

Stephen S


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.