stbenge <UN### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:

> > [Tor Olav wrote:]
> > I had a look at your macro to see if I could make it more efficient.
> > Here's what I came up with:
> >
> > But I'm not sure if it still works like you intended.
>
> It seems to work better than my versions.
>

I just did an A/B test of your 3rd version with Tor's reworked version, and the
first thing I noticed in Tor's was some coincident-surface speckling of the HF
base--NOT related to the plane (I moved that out of the way.) Perhaps there are
some duplicate slices at the base? (Just a guess.)

Also, with your version, water_level can be used in the HF to erase the base (or
any part of the HF.)  In Tor's version, water_level doesn't behave normally, and
instead produces some odd results (a square block shows up below the
water_level.)  Just thought I'd mention these differences.

Keep those developments coming!!

Ken

Post a reply to this message