"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> ...But there's also the odd fact that
> the applied pattern (or image_map) ends up being flipped upside down(?) like a
> mirror-image, AND that the 'origin point' of the pattern/image is out of
> place...

BY 'image_map,' what I meant to say was "an image_map used as [or used as part
of] the HF function"--not an image_map *texture* applied to the HF afterward
(which is applied as it should be.) Sorry if that confused anyone.

Ken

Post a reply to this message