Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> >>      Is God willing to prevent phrogams, but not able?
> >>        Then he is not omnipotent.
> >>      Is he able, but not willing, to prevent phrogams?
> >>        Then he is malevolent.
>
> Clearly God is willing *and* able to prevent phrogams, then, yes?
>
> >   In any case, I think that's called a false dichotomy.
>
> Clearly, since God actually did prevent phrogams. :-)
>


It took me a long time to get your movie reference, but I got it.

Christianity, at least, doesn't make much sense at all without a Cross.

Post a reply to this message