clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> They really, absolutely, positively claim that this is /not/ photoshopped:
>
> http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleimages/dan/cantbelieve5/chalk.jpg
>
> (Though they admit some "editing" /has/ been done - using several liters
> of paint... see http://www.metanamorph.com, "Lave Burst")

Gotta love urban art.  Nowadays much better than old graffiti... :)

Post a reply to this message