|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> Additionally, some of the weirder features of Haskell are missing. (No
> more curried functions, no lambda functions, no pattern matching...)
What - a functional language without lambda functions? C'mon, I always thought
that was the icing on the cake...
I'd love to see such a functional language. Maybe it would help me grok the
concept, too - it somehow feels that functional programming concepts may really
be useful, and that I just didn't manage to really grasp the concepts.
And I mean grasp, not just comprehend from a theoretical point of view.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |