Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> Additionally, some of the weirder features of Haskell are missing. (No
> more curried functions, no lambda functions, no pattern matching...)

What - a functional language without lambda functions? C'mon, I always thought
that was the icing on the cake...

I'd love to see such a functional language. Maybe it would help me grok the
concept, too - it somehow feels that functional programming concepts may really
be useful, and that I just didn't manage to really grasp the concepts.

And I mean grasp, not just comprehend from a theoretical point of view.

Post a reply to this message