|
 |
"David H. Burns" <dhb### [at] cherokeetel net> wrote:
> Someone told me that the next version of Pov-Ray would be OOP. Horrors!
> Another
> useful and fun thing lost to EEP. Another triumph of the EPP! (It
> seems to me that
> the Pov-Ray scripting language already makes more intelligent use of
> "objects" than OOP.) Will we
> next see Microsoft Visual Pov-Ray.Net along with Microsoft Pov-Ray
> Development Systems?
>
> Alas, Alas, Tell me it isn't so.
>
> David
Why do you associate OOP with .Net?
Did you know that you can program OOP with functional or imperative languages?
That it's a design philosophy more than a language feature?
Besides, there are already integrated modellers and development environments for
POV-Ray. None from MS (yet), but they are there ;)
....Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
