Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> >
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/17/apollo-landing-sites-imaged-by-lro/
>
> > Gee, looks like there's footprints on the moon after all.
>
>   Sadly, I have hard time believing even such tangible evidence is going to
> convince the conspiracy theorists. They will just say that the images are
> faked (and will undoubtedly point out "flaws" in them), or the most idiot
> ones of them will say that they are actually not depicting the landing sites
> at all.

This one's my favorite comment:

-------------------------
2.   John Says:
July 17th, 2009 at 10:54 am



available evidence, right?
-------------------------

Yeah, right. 'Nuff said I think :P

Post a reply to this message