|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> >> I was thinking more along the lines of
> >>
> >> FOR /R %f IN (*) DO echo %f
> >
> > Yes. But the right answer is "both, depending on what options you give."
>
> Probably, yes. (I already figured out - for another problem - that %~nf
> strips the file extension.) Personally, I'm not fond of all these funky
> abbriviations. I'd refer something like %{drop suffix %f} or something.
ah, the guy who enjoys a programming language comprised of obfuscated symbols in
confusing point-free style wish what is supposed to be concise scripting
languages to be comprised of verbose commands. Makes plenty of sense. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |