|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"triple_r" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> For whatever
> it's worth (and the value is debatable), they determined that, legally
> speaking, ID is not science.
Forgive me for talking to myself, but before I start problems I should emphasize
that I really don't mind whether you fall into one camp or the other. What I
despise is the dishonesty--the disingenuous claims by groups like the Discovery
Institute that they're trying to uncover objective truth without any religious
motives.
- Ricky
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |