|
 |
"Chris B" <nom### [at] nomail com> wrote:
> A simpler alternative that sidesteps these problems entirely is to consider
> using prism objects instead of meshes. It's a bit of a cheat, but with this
> number of points it could give you something that looks fairly similar. This
> idea is to basically draw a series of pyramids with their apexes at the
> required coordinates. It may therefore trick the viewer, giving the illusion
> of forming a coherent mesh-like surface.
If the density of points is quite uniform despite all randomness, using blobs
instead of spheres might give good results, too, I'd guess.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
