|
 |
Hmm... didn't I mention not too long ago that the FSF is going a bit overboard?
(And I hadn't even heard of this one then.)
Good to know I'm not the only retard who thinks this way...
Anyway, introducing technical barriers in GPL'ed code is a bit nonsensical:
Everyone can create a version of it with these checks "amputated". Everyone
actually explicitly has a to do so.
What's next? Trying to put this technical barrier under cover of laws
prohibiting or restricting circumvention?
What I see convinces me even more that the FSF's goal is to *force* all software
authors to give away their software for free, because for some weird reason they
think there is a higher moral right to free software.
I must correct myself: This is not so much a "political" thing, as I had claimed
earlier, but a "religious" one.
All your codebase are belong to us.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |