|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
> andrel wrote:
> > On 17-Jan-09 19:58, Darren New wrote:
> >> John VanSickle wrote:
> >>> And there is no observation, or combination of observations, which is
> >>> inconsistent with the existence of God, nor can there ever be such.
> >>
> >> First, define God.
> >
> > Something outside space and time that can not interact with our
> > universe. ;)
>
> I'm happy with that definition. In that case, there's neither reason to
> believe in it or disbelieve in it. There's certainly no reason to worship
> it, pray to it, or tell others what it wants you to do.
But seemingly there are lots of reasons to start flamewars about it. :)
He's also The guy who defined man and woman. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |