|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp <war### [at] tag povray org> wrote:
> Patrick Elliott <sel### [at] npgcable com> wrote:
> > Yeah. His definition would make Apple DOS and Prodos "not operating
> > systems", because it was possible, in both, to talk directly to Apple
> > hardware
>
> You don't even know what "my" definition is (which isn't mine, as I have
> said several times). You just assume from what Darren seems to assume.
Your definition is the Tanenbaum one, right?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |