Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Patrick Elliott <sel### [at] npgcablecom> wrote:
> > Yeah. His definition would make Apple DOS and Prodos "not operating
> > systems", because it was possible, in both, to talk directly to Apple
> > hardware
>
>   You don't even know what "my" definition is (which isn't mine, as I have
> said several times). You just assume from what Darren seems to assume.

Your definition is the Tanenbaum one, right?

Post a reply to this message