"Marc-Hendrik Bremer" <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
>
> > The statement gets evaluated to true or false (which is one or zero
> > in POV SDL). Once the "mod(num,2)" has been evaluated, the statement
> > then becomes "0=1" or "1=1" which in turn evaulates to 0 or 1 (i.e.
> > false or true).
>
> Excuse me, but isn't the statement in this case totally obsolet?
> It evaluates to 0 when mod(num,2) is 0 and it evaluates to 1 if mod(num,2)
> is 1.
>
> Or did i miss something?

No - you're exactly right. It makes it explicit what the check is for, but is
unnecessary.

Post a reply to this message