Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Patrick Elliott wrote:
>  > One has to be real careful, when talking about the supposed
> > supernatural, not to lend accidental credence to what is non-credible. ;)
>
> What makes you think the effect is supernatural?

1) Natural effects tend to leave evidence that is more tangible than lens
flares, overexposed camera straps, and imprints on the reporter's central
nervous system.

2) There is no known natural accounting for dead people somehow being alive with
diaphanous bodies and no internal organs, or for clothing just as ethereal as
the bodies.  But that could change.  (Of course, Bill's dead person is neither
diaphanous nor clothed, so she might be natural after all.)

Post a reply to this message