|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
David Buck <dav### [at] simberon com> wrote:
> Nimish Ajmani wrote:
>
> > But maybe, you could use ip addresses to back check spam votes.???
> >
> > -Nimish
> >
>
> The problem with IP addresses is that many people use DHCP which
> dynamically allocates IP addresses. The same person may get different
> IP addresses each time they logon and the IP address used by a spammer
> may later be used by a legitimate voter. Besides, I would like the
> ability to vote from whatever IP address I happen to be using at the time.
>
> David Buck
That's true. I hadn't thought about that.
As for points, I think 10 is better than 5, because the more points allows for a
greater degree of quality decision.
I liked the 20 point system, because, I used it much like the French grading
system, which was based on 20 points, but if I had to choose between 5 and 10,
I'd prefer 10, again, for a greater degree of quality variance.
I hope that helped.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |