Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> SharkD wrote:
>  > I've scaled everything by 10 and get virtually identical results.
>
> Hardly a surprise if you contain the isosurface in a sphere of radius R but
> define the surface to be R *plus* something, don't you? ;-)
>
>  Thorsten

Adding the "something" actually causes the radius to be less than 1. Also, I
don't see how what you've suggested has any affect on banding.

Post a reply to this message