Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
> > Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> >> That's an implementation bug. Invisible is talking about AWT *design*,
> >> which can't be just "fixed on the next release".
> >
> > Yes. He was changing the topic, and I was still on the original topic.
> > :-) Just saying, AWT wasn't the worst of it. Java had all kinds of evil
> > brokenness, and still does.
>
> So does .Net have a less horribly broken library design then?

probably and sadly yes.  Because it was made to run on a single OS from a single
company.  Many choices and tradeoffs are easier to make as is making it work
nice with the underlying architecture.  of course, it's less broken but much
more evil than Java. ;)

Post a reply to this message