"Fredrik Eriksson" <noo### [at] nowherecom> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:07:13 +0100, nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > "Fredrik Eriksson" <noo### [at] nowherecom> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:39:05 +0100, nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom>
> >> wrote:
> >> > really?!  It's possible to have a Windows file with actually no
> >> > extension?  I don't mean hiding the extension from view, but
> >> > actually having none...
> >>
> >> Of course it is. What made you think otherwise?
> >
> > old times?  I remember at some point Windows didn't let it be done.
>
> At what point was that? Even MS-DOS let you have extensionless files.

perhaps it did, but not obviously.  Alain said he had to set up some
configuration in order to do it.

Post a reply to this message