"Fredrik Eriksson" <noo### [at] nowherecom> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:39:05 +0100, nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > really?!  It's possible to have a Windows file with actually no
> > extension?  I don't mean hiding the extension from view, but
> > actually having none...
>
> Of course it is. What made you think otherwise?

old times?  I remember at some point Windows didn't let it be done.

Post a reply to this message