Tim Cook <z99### [at] bellsouthnet> wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
> > Sherry Shaw wrote:
> >> whether or not Schrödinger's Lab Assistant looks in the box, because
> >> the *cat* knows what happened."
> >
> > That was exactly the point of the thought-experiment. At what level of
> > sophistication does the "observer" collapse the possibilities? The
> > argument was over whether having instruments there was sufficient to
> > "collapse the wave form", or whether someone actually had to look at the
> > instruments.
> >
> > </fuddyduddy>
>
> "If nobody can observe you, you don't exist."

But pointing again to the cat's point of view.
What's about, if you are yourself in a box, all is black, you can't see
anything? Just thinking, in absolute darkness. Nobody can hear you. (So you
don't ecxist for other observers outside of the box.)
You can think, so you are.
But what are you? - You can't see anything.
How long can you preserve your mind?

Post a reply to this message