"triple_r" <rre### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> It's explaned in the following link somewhere in the middle, but it
> basically amounts to the vorticity minus the shear, leaving the rotation.
> Not my paper of course, but I just tried (unsuccessfully) to replicate the
> results.  I couldn't get mine even close to turbulent.
>  ...
>  - Ricky
>
>
> "Kirk Andrews" <kir### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> > "triple_r" <rre### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> > > Vortex structure of flow around a cube.  Not happy with it since it's
> > > begging for scattering, but I thought I'd plug the simulation results in to
> > > POV-Ray and get something pretty.  This took a while, so I might never get
> > > around to animaing the other 199 frames.  Seemed worth sharing.
> > >
> > > - Ricky
> >
> > This looks neat--but maybe you could explain what you mean by "vortex
> > structure of flow"?  Just curious--sounds interesting.
> >
> > -- Kirk




Oops, I top-posted.  Sorry.

 - Ricky

Post a reply to this message