"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> wrote:
> Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> >
> > (not only responding to you)
> >
> > Guys, you are repeating incorrect assumptions and guesses already clarified
> > in various previous discussions, particularly in the stills group. There is
> > no uncertainty who "owns the site" or anything like that.
> >
> > Just get some perspective here: Do you think everybody who can do something
> > about the IRTC situation has just been sitting around for years with an
> > alternate plan to jump in at the very instance something goes wrong, has the
> > time to do that instantly, and really nothing better to do? Just get real,
> > please!!! Things take a bit of time and wild speculation about facts already
> > known to be false won't get you *anywhere*. Those speculations are just
> > waste _your_ own time -- lots of ray-tracing to do, you don't need a
> > competition for that! ;-)
> >
> >  Thorsten, POV-Team
>
> Maybe one of the reasons that there is a bit of speculation is that people
> are unclear of the situation. True there has been clarifications of wrong
> assumptions but it has been piecemeal and not in the same place. It might
> help the community if someone could take the time and trouble to spell out
> the situation, simply.
>
>
>
> Stephen

Nobody is asking for an instant fix, but you know, days, weeks and months
are passing by.
Like Stephen said, people just need to know. Why has the IRTC come to an
standstill, and what can we expect in the future.



Hildur

Post a reply to this message