|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Tim Attwood" <tim### [at] comcast net> wrote:
>
> You might try averaging a bit - interpolate 2 or ...
> function{ // untested
> ( dens(x,y,z)
> +dens(x+0.05,y,z) + dens(x-0.05,y,z)
> +dens(x,y+0.05,z) + dens(x,y-0.05,z)
> +dens(x,y,z+0.05) + dens(x,y,z-0.05)
> )/7
> }
I created two other images at
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/thread/%3Cweb.45ac7028a8a7f8c81524ae1d0@news.povray.org%3E//povray.binari
es.images/thread/%3Cweb.45ac7028a8a7f8c81524ae1d0@news.povray.org%3E/
You guy's ideas worked, cool.
But for the case of "interpolate 2", the resulting image is quite strange
with compare to the two images of "interpolate 1" whose shape is what I
want, since I use the same threshold value.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |