Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:59:56 -0400, einarabelc5 wrote:
>
> > I could just go find a Different renderer If I just thought about me. Oh
> > and thanks for thinking you're the savior of the world.
>
> No, just explaining to someone who *thinks* they know how the world works
> how it *really* works.
>
> > It says at the end of the Web interface and I quote:
> >
> > Attachments
> > You may not post attachments to this newsgroup.
>
> Operative words being "this newsgroup".  Didn't think to look in a group
> that was labeled as holding binary files, did you?  Assumed something

> incorrectly?  Not really my problem, is it?
>
> > Wait for you to show up and show me the way. THERE'S NO SCARCITY. NEXT!!!
>
> Hardly, you could *ask* if there was an alternative to using a newsreader
> instead of *assuming* that that was the only option.
>
> >> > Oh and BTW peeing didn't come to any section of Triune Brain. Being
> >> > animal, logical and sentimental.
> >>
> >> You've stopped making sense here.
> >
> > Of course I did. As I expected you just do not have a sense of humor to
> > percieve that last sentence. Again it just fits the rest of what you show.
> > Test Approved. (No, I don't expect you to understand this neither)
>
> Actually, spouting absolute nonsense in the middle of a somewhat serious
> discussion and then gauging the reaction of those who choose to respond
> as an indication as to whether or not they have a sense of humour or not
> is just plain stupid. <shrug> Feel free to make yourself look like an
> idiot more, now *that's* funny.
>
> > Thanks James, you Just answered all the suspicions I had about your way of
> > thinking.
>
> James?  Who is this "James" person of whom you speak, and what relation
> does this person's way of thinking have to the discussion at hand?  Or are
> you *assuming* again that my proper name is "James"?  There you go again
> with the assumptions.  Some people never learn.
>
> > Good thing there are still people like Steve out there, people you can
> > reason with. "Much appreciate your answer Steve I admire You for Doin'
> > that". You do not need to cover insecurities with false pride.
>
> Insecurities?  Hah, now *that's* funny.  Again, you don't know anything
> about me (other than that I live in Utah, that is, and that's because I
> told you).
>
> > Selfish.. Guilty as CHARGHE...likely to help...Guilty as CHARGE...I just
> > don't do so many questions...I don't need to. Since I can find answers in
> > so many other different ways.
>
> It's your time, not mine.  Seems to me it would make more sense to ask
> your question one place in a way that allows it to be answered.  Then you
> wouldn't have to waste time going to six thousand different places hoping
> you got an answer.  But again, it's your time to waste.
>
> "Likely to help"?  Wow, did you misread, I said you were unlikely to
> receive help, not likely to provide help.  You can do whatever you like,
> of course, but pissing off the people who can help you means (let me say
> this slowly for your benefit) that   THEY   are   unlikely   to   help
> YOU. Get it?
>
> > Don't worry, I don't expect you to get these things together into your
> > head as a possible/viable way that can work together.
> >

> > I've been done with your kind since a long time ago, ponitless to talk to
> > a square head.It always have been.
>
> Ah, invective, how I've missed you.  "Square Head" indeed - please, say
> something else that's just silly and pointless.  Then we can laugh at you
> more.  More useful than arguing with you?  You're nothing more than a -
> shall we say - diversion to see just how deep you can dig yourself in?
>
> So please, don't let me stop you, you're doing a *dandy* job.
>
> > AND YES, FEEL FREE TO CALL ME MORON.
>
> That would be far, far too easy.  It's far more entertaining to watch you
> demonstrate your abilities in that area.
>
> I started with some friendly advice about how to appropriately get the
> help you were seeking.  It's not my problem that you decided I was
> attacking you and have decided to attack back.  The exact same reaction
> you gave Steve when he initially responded to you.  In fact, the reaction
> to Steve which started this subthread about (among other things) your lack
> of manners in the online world.
>
> I know your kind - the kind that always has to have the last word in an
> arguement; the kind who can't admit that they made a mistake. The kind who
> can't just say "thanks, I didn't know that's how things worked around
> here".  The kind who can't admit to making a mistake, own up to it, and
> move on with life.
>
> I've dealt with literally *thousands* of people like you over the years.
> People who ask a question like "my thing's broke" and expect to get help.
> People who, when offered sound advice on how to solve a problem *argue*
> with the advice given.
>
> Your kind doesn't make me angry; your kind *amuses* me during the idle
> minutes between deadlines.
>
> Jim

Ok dude, you're right, I apologize...It was my mistake. Your last response
has changed my mind about you.

The thing Is actually I think just as you do and see that we have many more
points in what we agree than what we do in what we disagree.
I wont make excuses for the stress of the work and wanting to get results
ASAP, didn't meant to harrass no one but didn't wanted to be harrased,
either. I just see you are Cocky but I can cope with that now, it is cool
for me.

My respect to you.

Take care.

Thanks for the experience.


Kind Regards

Post a reply to this message