|
|
"Bruno Cabasson" <bru### [at] alcatelaleniaspacefr> wrote:
> "POVMAN" <s### [at] acom> wrote:
> > > move the well a little to the right and add a second element, maybe a
> > > seagull on the water, or even a mouse on some driftwood, to the left. That
> > > would bring some more dynamics to the image, give it even more of a story.
> >
> > I think you could reinforce the idea, by having another inverted object in
> > the distance. I'm being a bit obvious, but perhaps a "flying" submarine
> > might be the thing.
> Or a floating anvil ...
How about a herd of grazing cattle standing on the water nearby?
My main comment would be that the water didn't look like water at first
glance. Once I'd registered it, it looked OK though. I think it could be
bluer, with less reflectivity at the higher angle (in the foreground).
The well and bucket modelling is excellent!
Mike Williams' rope macros would be useful in perfecting the line. The well
might benefit from construction with individual brick objects at this
proximity; the brick texture is too obviously procedural.
Looks good though... :)
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|