|
|
Rick Measham <rickm*at%isite.net.au> wrote:
> Orchid XP v2 wrote:
> > Very impressive, in my opinion. Not quite perfect, but I can't put my
> > finger on why...
>
> Looks great, the textures are just lovely.
>
> But while we have our fingers out, there's a couple of compositions
> things I'll put my finger on:
>
> 1. The two doors should come a lot closer to meeting as should the
> vertical timbers
> 2. There's (possibly deliberate) evenly-spaced filleting down the
> vertical timbers
> 3. The lock isn't held to the door in any way that will stop intrusion
> 3a. The RHS needs to have bolts or hotrivet through the timber
> - round heads on the outside (and inside if they're
> hotrivets and the long part of the hinge normally sits over
> the top of that part making it even harder to unbolt.
> 3b. If you don't fold it over then the hinge-pin in the door
> needs to be away from the gap between the doors so that all
> that is exposed to the other side is flat iron
> 4. The doors need diagonal cross-bracing .. this holds the door up and
> will stop it sagging
>
> (If you're going for the look of low-tech (despite the padlock) then
> you'll need to make the doors sag a fair bit and increase the size of
> screws and bolt to the point where they could be hand-forged)
>
> If you don't hate me right now, care to share that timber texture?
>
> Cheers!
> Rick Measham
Rick ,
You will almost write the door story. I'm very hating you:)
this is a joke.
I have not thought to make a architectural door.
I have wanted to realistic overlay to the timbers.
This wood texture :
http://www.monitorstudios.com/bcloward/textures/wood_boards.jpg
Regards.
Hasan
Post a reply to this message
|
|