POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : using assumed_gamma of 1.0 ... a discussion : Re: using assumed_gamma of 1.0 ... a discussion Server Time
1 Aug 2024 16:26:21 EDT (-0400)
  Re: using assumed_gamma of 1.0 ... a discussion  
From: Kenneth
Date: 17 Dec 2005 20:15:01
Message: <web.43a4b68142019f408a10c4100@news.povray.org>
Christian Walther <cwa### [at] gmxch> wrote:

> If the lower image looks more aesthetically pleasing to you, that's
> probably because ideal diffuse reflectors aren't that common in the real
> world, so...
> ...you may change the sphere's reflectivity properties using the
> "brilliance" keyword. With "finish { ambient 0 diffuse 1 brilliance 2 }"
> (and assumed_gamma 1), a similar image to Ard's lower one is achieved.

I'm curious; would you yourself use the
brilliance trick to visually correct the
rendered image (as seen in the POV preview render),or would you
leave it as-is because it's physically correct?
I'd genuinely like to know, as it will help me to further understand how you
(and others) use and interact with POV.

Ken


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.