Severi Salminen <sev### [at] NOT_THISsibafi> wrote:
> I think the usage of "Copyright" texts just fools many people to think
> that it is _needed_ for an artwork to be copyrighted. That is not the
> case in most countries - AFAIK. And then they think that the absence of
> the text means the work is public domain or whatever,
>
> And as Jaime pointed out, in order to work the text should be very big
> and as distracting as possible.

And I find even the smallest copyright notice distracts and
detracts from an image. Infringements seem rare, damage
minimal and, as this thread shows, eventually noticed.

Post a reply to this message