Christopher James Huff wrote:
>Forgot about that...the simplest solution would be to replace "gradient
>x" with "function {sin(x)/2 + 0.5}", or you could use cos() if you want
>a symmetrical pattern. Oh, and remove the sine_wave keyword, since it is
>now in the pattern itself. Or you could just translate the pattern far
>enough that the mirroring point is out of your way.

Ok, replacing the gradient x with a function is a far better solution than
what I did.. which was to add the keyword "phase 0.25" so the sin would be
in sync ;)

Thanks for the tip,
O.

Post a reply to this message