Thank you for your positive comments. The .mov version is better quality,
but is heavier.

I had no tools for making an mpeg file in which I could add an audio
channel. This is the reason why I am only providing avi and mov versions
of the film.

As I said in my initial mail, I am much endebted to POVRay for the
quality of the images I got for my film. At several times I have
discovered pictures that were nicer than I was initially expecting.

I am in the process of making a second film... with POVray, of
course ;-).

-Christian

None wrote:
>Christian Jacquemin <Chr### [at] limsifr> wrote in
>news:3F3### [at] limsifr:
>
>> [...]
>> I have developped Virtual Choreographer a tool for designing 3D scenes
>> [...]
>
>Sounds nice a nice tool.
>
>The film looks good, very interesting, although I saw the .avi version and
>it's quite blocky, especially the second half where the frame rates start
>to take a hit (I understand it's because it's a long film being fit in a
>small file).  But I think I got a good sense for it.
>

Post a reply to this message