Renderdog wrote:
>It does look like there's not enough people to support discussions of the
>top 20, and it might become repetitive eventually anyway, if there isn't
>enough new blood to carry on the discussions.

I'm afraid I'm the one who suggested top 20, and I see I may have been over
enthusiastic.  The basic format is sound, it's just that interest has waned
faster than I thought it would.  Top ten looks like it would be a more
reasonable number, but even two weeks might be too long.  How about for the
next round we try to do the top ten at a rate of two per day, so we can get
through all of them in a week?

If someone wants to talk about an image that falls outside the top 10, they
are free to bring up any other entry at any time.

Post a reply to this message