I like to use raytracing to create 'impossible' scenes and make them look as
if they were real. Ok, we can experiment a lot with perspective, texturing,
lightning and atmospheric effects. But why raytracing landscapes which are
already real (and even looking more natural on photos?). I'm missing some
fun in interpreting the theme and compositing a nice scenery this time.

As I read here, there are very good ideas in interpreting the theme and I'm
very sad I will never see those pictures. So have some courage and render
your ideas, that's what raytracing is for (and not winning any
competition)! And if you don't want to submit, post your images in the
newsgroup so everybody can see what really "spectacular landscapes" are
looking like!

I think the topic would be ok., but the description is "off-topic" to
raytracing!!!

render on
jo

Post a reply to this message