>Not a bad idea at all. I don't think that having strict sub-section names...
Thanks but -Of course-,-Of course-, NO strict naming here...(I took some
optional-though-not-randomly-chosen-names-I-must-admit as exemples ;)

>sometimes the camera may well be found at the bottom), but the possibility...
this doesn't change anything because "scanning" file sequentially and then
placing them into appropriate sections doesn't mean they MUST follow a
strict order

>of having sections tags that the editor would recognise as such would be
and again Thanks because -sections tags- (or tabs?) was the word I was
chasing after ...seem that your english is better than mine!



Gilles Tran wrote:

>web.3d650aeb25298f3fddfe293c0[at]news.povray.org...
>
>> well for lazy but practical people, the optional ability when
>> editing/opening a file to create sub-sections containing the different
>> parts of the scene/file:
>
>Not a bad idea at all. I don't think that having strict sub-section names
>would be useful (there are a zillion ways to optimise a scene script and
>sometimes the camera may well be found at the bottom), but the possibility
>of having sections tags that the editor would recognise as such would be
>quite interesting. It could allow the user to skip easily from one section
>to another instead of scrolling.
>
>G.
>
>
>--
>**********************
>http://www.oyonale.com
>**********************
>- Graphic experiments
>- POV-Ray and Poser computer images
>- Posters
>

Post a reply to this message