Christopher James Huff wrote:
>In article <web.3d5e790b2f91788264908380[at]news.povray.org>,
> "=RAY=" <ray### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>
>> Actually, that isn't that bad.  IIRC POV-Ray could be considered free
>> software under the GPL, as free software is explained in
>> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
>
>No, it isn't. Go read re-read povlegal, specifically the section titled
>"WHY ISN'T POV-RAY OPEN SOURCE?".
>http://www.povray.org/povlegal.html
Read the page again.
It says nothing about derivative works in the definiton of free software.

Post a reply to this message