[On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:00:14 +0000, Mike Williams <mik### [at] nospamplease>]
| The time taken to encode a file is quite noticeable - as much as 68
| seconds for an 800x600 image on my 500MHz machine, and probably quite a
| bit longer on the machines that were commonly available on 1995.
On top of that, it doesn't do a much better job than good old jpeg,
and I suspect jpeg2000 would be superior.
--
A penny for your thoughts.
Mine are more expensive.
please>]
| The time taken to encode a file is quite noticeable - as much as 68
| seconds for an 800x600 image on my 500MHz machine, and probably quite a
| bit longer on the machines that were commonly available on 1995.
On top of that, it doesn't do a much better job than good old jpeg,
and I suspect jpeg2000 would be superior.
--
A penny for your thoughts.
Mine are more expensive.