On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:08:36 -0600, "GreyBeard"
<r.b### [at] sbcglobalnet> wrote:

>
>"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
>news:abuu40pefkqd07a7uk8fqvat1ndcua1vbt@4ax.com...
>>
>> The scanner they use for the negatives? You *are* referring to
>> chemical prints aren't you?
>>
>Perchance you should learn the terminology before inserting foot in open
>mouth.  I'm afraid photography was around in a more advanced state long
>before digital was anything but a term for counting on ones fingers.

Excuse me, but I sincerely did think were were talking about chemical
photography here and therefore a scanner would eventually come into
play to get into the digital realm.

Sheeh! Jumping up and down like is not going to win you support.

>

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message