|
 |
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001 09:59:48 +0000 John VanSickle wrote:
>Will p.o-t be back?
Hi, John. Ken's post from 02-Jan-2001, message-ID:
<3A52B9EC.577C3B2E@pacbell.net> pretty much sums it up.
Also, I saw your other post in this group concerning an
'interpretation' of Australian law posted by an individual - hopefully
you were just kidding and not actually accepting that the law was as
that person distorted it.
--
Alan - ako### [at] povray org - a k o n g <at> p o v r a y <dot> o r g
http://www.povray.org - Home of the Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer
Post a reply to this message
|
|
