|
|
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:32:04 EDT, Eli Sarver wrote:
> Ron Parker wrote:
>> o If sample code is included, it should either be possible to select it
>> and copy it directly from the PDF document, or there should be a hyperlink
>> to a text file containing the sample code. This should apply whenever
>> the sample is more than 2-3 lines long, and possibly even more often.
>
> There's a button in acrobat reader with an ibar next to a T. You click that
> and you can drag and copy text out.
And it even works, if you didn't enable the security features of Acrobat or
use formatting that was just a little too wonky (columns, sidebars, tables,
etc.) That was the point I was trying to make there.
> It may be a pain in the butt to set everything up, but once you are running
> with latex, you'll wonder why you use such meddling software like word and
> acrobat.
I actually used TeX, and later AMS-TeX, to do all of my homework assignments
when I was still a lowly undergraduate. LaTeX always seemed like too much
extra sugar. However, it takes a special kind of person to like writing in
either of them.
Anyway, you seem to have missed my point, which was that if one is going to
distribute a technical document in PDF, one should keep those rules in mind.
I wasn't addressing the issue of what tools one might use to generate said
PDF file, or whether generating it was a good idea in the first place. The
scary part is that all of those rules come from real-life experience with
very badly done PDF files.
--
#local R=<7084844682857967,0787982,826975826580>;#macro L(P)concat(#while(P)chr(
mod(P,100)),#local P=P/100;#end"")#end background{rgb 1}text{ttf L(R.x)L(R.y)0,0
translate<-.8,0,-1>}text{ttf L(R.x)L(R.z)0,0translate<-1.6,-.75,-1>}sphere{z/9e3
4/26/2001finish{reflection 1}}//ron.parker@povray.org My opinions, nobody else's
Post a reply to this message
|
|