POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Pov 4.00 question : Re: Pov 4.00 question Server Time
6 Aug 2024 19:32:23 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Pov 4.00 question  
From: Ron Parker
Date: 30 Jan 2002 16:00:50
Message: <slrna5gnnj.ca.ron.parker@fwi.com>
On 30 Jan 2002 15:19:27 -0500, Warp wrote:
> Christopher James Huff <chr### [at] maccom> wrote:
>: The POV Team has said they were rewriting it in C++. Actually, the 
>: current source implements a kind of OOP, it is just hard to manage.
>: The scripting...it could be argued that it is already OOP
> 
>   It maybe modular, but it certainly is not object-oriented.
>   Two basic requirements for object-orientedness are inheritance and dynamic
> binding. Without those you just have a modular language, not object-oriented.

I assume you're referring to the claim that POV SDL is OO here.  The POV
source, though written mostly in C, could be said to have both inheritance
and dynamic binding.

-- 
#macro R(L P)sphere{L F}cylinder{L P F}#end#macro P(V)merge{R(z+a z)R(-z a-z)R(a
-z-z-z a+z)torus{1F clipped_by{plane{a 0}}}translate V}#end#macro Z(a F T)merge{
P(z+a)P(z-a)R(-z-z-x a)pigment{rgbt 1}hollow interior{media{emission T}}finish{
reflection.1}}#end Z(-x-x.2y)Z(-x-x.4x)camera{location z*-10rotate x*90}


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.