|
|
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 22:30:07 +0100, Jan Walzer wrote:
> Question: How far back do we need Backward-compatibility ?
> Commas are standard at least since 3.0, so I think somewhere should be a
> hard-cut ...
But why? The cases where it's still possible to leave them out are perfectly
unambiguous anyway, so why require them?
--
#macro R(P)z+_(P)_(P)_(P+1)_(P+1)+z#end#macro Q(C,T)bicubic_patch{type 1u_steps
6v_steps 6R(1)R(3)R(5)R(7)pigment{rgb z}}#end#macro _(Y)#local X=asc(substr(C,Y
,1))-65;<T+mod(X,4)div(X,4)9>-2#end#macro O(T)Q("ABEFUQWS",T)Q("WSXTLOJN",T)#
end O(0)O(3)Q("JNKLCGCD",0)light_source{x 1}// ron### [at] povrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|