On 7 Dec 2001 11:18:20 -0500, Warp wrote:
> Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
>: If you post an image to a binary group and then decide to provide the
>: scene source (due to overwhelming demand), post the source in the
>: appropriate binary (for attachments) or text (when your source is typed
>: or pasted into the body of your message) group and make a reference to
>: your posted image in the subject line.
> 
>   I don't understand why the scene source can't be posted in the same group
> (and the same thread) as the original image. (I have don't that several times
> and nobody has complained; I think nobody has any reason to do so...)

Well, it depends on what the source is.  If it's a general-purpose technique
that just happens to be represented by the image, it makes a lot more sense
to put it in a scene-files group.  But that's just my opinion.

-- 
#macro R(P)z+_(P)_(P)_(P+1)_(P+1)+z#end#macro Q(C,T)bicubic_patch{type 1u_steps
6v_steps 6R(1)R(3)R(5)R(7)pigment{rgb z}}#end#macro _(Y)#local X=asc(substr(C,Y
,1))-65;<T+mod(X,4)div(X,4)9>-2#end#macro O(T)Q("ABEFUQWS",T)Q("WSXTLOJN",T)#
end O(0)O(3)Q("JNKLCGCD",0)light_source{x 1}// ron### [at] povrayorg

Post a reply to this message