On 11 Sep 2001 15:38:02 -0400, Ron Parker wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:04:41 +0200, tth wrote:
>>"Redbeard (MDJohnson)" wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I can understand Windows balking at such a large image, but libpng
>>> shouldn't.  IIRC, 30000 is well within the acceptable dimensions for PNG
>>> files.
>>> 
>>	so give us a Linux beta, please :)
>
>But why?  Nobody uses Linux anyway, right? :)

Speaking of the Linux beta, for whatever the information is worth I'd
like to point out that the under-development Linux version of 3.5 was
more than happy to render at least the first 300 lines of a 4000x30000 
PNG of a randomly-chosen test image.

--
#macro R(L P)sphere{L __}cylinder{L P __}#end#macro P(_1)union{R(z+_ z)R(-z _-z)
R(_-z*3_+z)torus{1__ clipped_by{plane{_ 0}}}translate z+_1}#end#macro S(_)9-(_1-
_)*(_1-_)#end#macro Z(_1 _ __)union{P(_)P(-_)R(y-z-1_)translate.1*_1-y*8pigment{
rgb<S(7)S(5)S(3)>}}#if(_1)Z(_1-__,_,__)#end#end Z(10x*-2,.2)camera{rotate x*90}

Post a reply to this message