On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:16:24 +0100, Rune wrote:
>Thanks for your explanation Ron. I think I understand it.
>
>However, I can't get it to work.
>
>I tried to look at the code Chris Colefax posted in his reply. When I
>changed the variable V2 to 2.0 the patches seemed to meet the criteria you
>mentioned, if I understood them correctly.

>(To see it more clearly comment out the reference sphere, toggle of the
>patches, use location <3,0,-3> in the camera, and add "orthographic" in the
>end of it)

I see it.  It's even more apparent with the camera at location -3.  I'm not
sure what's causing this.  The strange thing is that it applies to the edges,
whose behavior I thought I understood.

-- 
Ron Parker   http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions.  Mine.  Not anyone else's.

Post a reply to this message