|
|
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000 16:12:35 -0700, Angela Perry wrote:
>
>Steve wrote in message ...
>>Hi Angela
>>
>>There is the "10 Best" project that's currently under way, you can find
>>out about that at: http://10best.raytrace.com/tracinstyles.html
>>
>
>Thanks! It looks like a neat contest; I'll check it out.
>
>>And from what I've read on this server, POV development is all voluntary
>>so doesn't need supporting, but this news server does require some
>>financial input.
>>
>>Personally I wouldn't like to see this community turn into a fund raising
>>group, so I won't be taking part in any further activitis of this nature.
>>I'll buy the IRTC CDs and the 10Best CD but for me it ends there.
>
>Maybe I expressed myself poorly: this really isn't intended to be a fund
>raiser. The main purpose of this project would be to produce a reference
>book for beginners and even advanced users of POV-Ray, combining the talents
>of everyone willing to contribute sample graphics and tutorials.
>
>The only reason I mention where I would like any profits from this to go is
>because I want people to see this as a volunteer project. It wouldn't be
>fair for me to create a book using other people's tutorials and images, then
>publish it and keep the money.
>
>Please don't refuse to contribute on the basis that this is just another
>fundraiser. If you have a tutorial or image, or you know where one can be
>found, please let me know.
It sounds much better now, initially I got the impression it was being
produced just to raise money, but if it's being produced in order to be
a source of reference for beginners then I'm all for it.
I've got quite a bit of stuff on my web page, but something that may be
more suitable is a gambelling chip macro that I wrote many moons ago
which might be a good item to use as an introduction/tutorial on macros.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
1:09am up 30 days, 3:31, 2 users, load average: 1.19, 1.21, 1.22
Post a reply to this message
|
|