|
 |
On 24 May 2000 03:56:35 -0400, Warp wrote:
>Ron Parker <ron### [at] povray org> wrote:
>: Nope. It could be, but it's not
>
> How is it represented then?
It's represented as a merge. There are special cases in the code for
merges. IIRC, it could be represented as the inverse of the intersections
of the inverses of the constituent objects, but it isn't.
> I remember this was a question in the 'hard-core povrayer test'. Someone
>said it's represented as an intersection of inverted objects or something
>similar, if I remember correctly.
Difference is represented as an intersection. Perhaps that's what you're
thinking of.
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
These are my opinions. I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
