On Wed, 03 Nov 1999 19:32:30 -0900, mr.art wrote:
>So why not put the camera on an object in a union?
...
>All these things POV does for every object.
>And for the camera. I thought it natural that
>the camera, as an object, could be included in
>a union{}.

You're right, I don't see any reason why it couldn't be, other than
because that's the way it is.  I was commenting on the "POV knows the
transform for every object" assertion, not on the (imho good) idea of
letting cameras be inside unions.

-- 
These are my opinions.  I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
The superpatch: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/
My other stuff: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html

Post a reply to this message