|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 16 Mar 2009 22:11:11 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:00:03 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 16 Mar 2009 18:37:34 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>
>>>Yeah, that's what I knew about. But I haven't heard any of those series
>>>either so even if it was a repeat, it's still new to us. :-)
>>>
>>>
>> I've only heard a couple, myself
>
>Time to start searching, methinks. :-)
>
A starting point, maybe
http://tinyurl.com/d75bx6
>>>Marble Arch.
>>
>> Oh! No you don't!
>
>I think rule 47(a) says that the winner is permitted to start the next
>round - and I'm already in hoc to you for a bought round, so I figured
>let's give it another go and see if I can earn that bought round back. :-)
>
I think that the teams are too small and we need an adjudicator.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |